- Joined
- Aug 24, 2014
- Messages
- 1,208
- Reaction score
- 312
@Caught in Strangereal @KinkyPrawn @samdragon @Ediwa @ByakuyaXVTogami
Okay, so I know that there's going to be plenty of questions on this last post and the two autohits in question. So let me explain. The two autohits are Bya's attack as well as Jay's second burst of shots.
The grounds for Bya's attack as an autohit are described in these two rulings:
Here and Here
Basically, Caught, the reason for this is two fold. Your defense against Roman's attacks are sound and reasonable. However, your defense against Kynigos' attack is not an actual defense but rather a theorized defense. You write what you could do and what you're prepared to do, but not an actual defense against the said attack. This is reflected in the two previous rulings which dictate that a theorized defense is not applicable. Additionally, Roman's defense against the blaster bolt interrupts your subsequent actions and since you do not have a secondary defense in play to protect Revora, it counts as an auto-hit.
As for the autohit against Jay, his rifle has an optimal range of 100m. He is firing at you from within 70. While you side-stepped the first volley, you mention no real defense against the second. Just saying that it would hit the ceiling due to recoil is inadequate. Why would it hit the ceiling? Are you doing something to alter his shots? No, if not, then his shots would not miss. They can only miss if you do an action. You specifically state doing an action against the first volley, but not the second.
As no defense is written, it is therefore an autohit.
Feel free to have Kinky and others chime in as well. I'm open to reasoning, but after I analyzed your last post and read through prior rulings, It seems that it has some gaping holes in it, namely an inadequate defense against both Bya and Ediwa's attacks.
Okay, so I know that there's going to be plenty of questions on this last post and the two autohits in question. So let me explain. The two autohits are Bya's attack as well as Jay's second burst of shots.
The grounds for Bya's attack as an autohit are described in these two rulings:
Here and Here
Basically, Caught, the reason for this is two fold. Your defense against Roman's attacks are sound and reasonable. However, your defense against Kynigos' attack is not an actual defense but rather a theorized defense. You write what you could do and what you're prepared to do, but not an actual defense against the said attack. This is reflected in the two previous rulings which dictate that a theorized defense is not applicable. Additionally, Roman's defense against the blaster bolt interrupts your subsequent actions and since you do not have a secondary defense in play to protect Revora, it counts as an auto-hit.
As for the autohit against Jay, his rifle has an optimal range of 100m. He is firing at you from within 70. While you side-stepped the first volley, you mention no real defense against the second. Just saying that it would hit the ceiling due to recoil is inadequate. Why would it hit the ceiling? Are you doing something to alter his shots? No, if not, then his shots would not miss. They can only miss if you do an action. You specifically state doing an action against the first volley, but not the second.
As no defense is written, it is therefore an autohit.
Feel free to have Kinky and others chime in as well. I'm open to reasoning, but after I analyzed your last post and read through prior rulings, It seems that it has some gaping holes in it, namely an inadequate defense against both Bya and Ediwa's attacks.