Dungeons and Dragons Roleplay

[Sovereign]

Would anyone be interest in a Dungeons and Dragons Roleplay? We'd play by DND rules, not free RP.

 

[Cainhurst Crow]

Which edition?

 

[Sovereign]

Probably 3.5.

 

[Cainhurst Crow]

Pathfinder content allowed or strictly 3.5?

 

[Sovereign]

Just DND. Might not be set in the Forgotten Realms though.

 

[Sovereign]

I will write a backstory up later if more people are interested.

 

[Andrewza]

Sign me up

 

[Logan]

If it gets enough interest I'd be game.

Greyhawk is a good campaign setting. Or Dragonlance.

 

[Jake]

This will be impossible on a forum, here is a good website for hosting tabletop games online.

 

[Andrewza]

I play table top games on military history forum it can be done here

 

[Cainhurst Crow]

I'm interested I think. I'll need to see the setting first. It'll be my first d&d style game. Should be fun.

 

[Psychronaut]

Joined to say I'm interested. But I gots some questions in this muh'.

1) I hear 3.5 is the noob-friendly version. Since this is my first actual DnD game, I'm newer than a factory-sealed copy of Metal Gear Solid 5: The Phantom Pain.

2) Do all of our characters have to be human? I don't usually play human characters.

3) I was in a similar RP. It was like DnD but with freeform combat and no dice, numbers or "builds". I'll get some concepts, but not all of them. This isn't a question.

 

[Logan]

Joined to say I'm interested. But I gots some questions in this muh'.

1) I hear 3.5 is the noob-friendly version. Since this is my first actual DnD game, I'm newer than a factory-sealed copy of Metal Gear Solid 5: The Phantom Pain.

2) Do all of our characters have to be human? I don't usually play human characters.

3) I was in a similar RP. It was like DnD but with freeform combat and no dice, numbers or "builds". I'll get some concepts, but not all of them. This isn't a question.

3.5 is only noob friendly if you have someone experienced with it to help you along and understand what's going on. It's the quintessential D&D experience as far as I'm concerned, though with the newest release of 5e it might finally have an edition to give it a run for its money.

4e is probably the most noob-centric edition of D&D - it's pretty much World of Warcraft with paper and pencil.

 

[Cainhurst Crow]

So I know I should wait till the setting is posted and all, but is there going to be a general alignment requirement of the group. EX: A all good, or all evil, or all neutral part requirement?

Was thinking of making a either lawful neutral or lawful evil merc. :P

 

[Green Ranger]

4E is terribad. 3.5e is where most people are most familiar with, but 5E looks awfully easy to pick up - plus free online distribution is a nice added bonus.

 

[Andrewza]

here they really ****** up with 4edstion

 

[Fang.]

3.5 us best.

Consider me in

 

[Psychronaut]

So what's the word on this thing? We still a-go, or what?