Trunk space OOC

[Darasuum]

Understood.
Edited, he now has lost complete function of his leg as soon as he stepped out of the cantina.

No, he got shot in the leg. The damage happened when he got shot. His leg isn't functioning when he gets shot. Please edit to reflect the appropriate damage and tag me when it is done because I do not get notifications when you edit your OOC post.

 

[DarkSaber]

Sorry.
What I meant was, he already had the same amount of damage but he was still tottering on the injured leg. After he got out, the stress it put on his leg ultimately gave way and he never stood on it again.

@Darasuum

 

[DarkSaber]

......
I didn't say he was entirely helpless...I still have a blaster and sabers still ignited, even if he's on the ground.
Also, is Kai a Sith Eternal? Bc the champions described Sith as "brothers and sisters." Would Kai honestly let him just be taken in for a bounty? It'd be betrayal to the Order.

Also, though he's injured, I mentioned Force Rage. I could technically give in to it, gain a burst of energy, and lunge easily at the Mandalorian as he stands leisurely over Xath, blaster set to stun.
@Darasuum @KinkyPrawn

 

[DarkSaber]

@KinkyPrawn,
Not cool. You completely edited your post and completely changed tactics. Your Mandalorian was at the mercy of a Force Rage enhanced Xath about 5 feet away (10 steps of injured walking is not a lot of distance), who would've swung with both already ignited sabers as you casually changed modes on your guns.
Me giving you a hint of what I might do does not classify a COMPLETE change of the post. You'd already accepted Xath's movement and continued the story before entirely removing that post and writing a new one. It was a mistake just as I did, but I did not edit to remove the consequences of that mistake.
This is entirely unfair and I hope you can see that. In my mind and I hope in yours, posting a message and then removing it is entirely unethical in this case.
Furthermore, THERE WAS NO FOLLOW UP SHOT. He was drawing the blaster and never pulled the trigger. Not an autohit.

 

[KinkyPrawn]

@KinkyPrawn,
Not cool. You completely edited your post and completely changed tactics. Your Mandalorian was at the mercy of a Force Rage enhanced Xath about 5 feet away (10 steps of injured walking is not a lot of distance), who would've swung with both already ignited sabers as you casually changed modes on your guns.
Me giving you a hint of what I might do does not classify a COMPLETE change of the post. You'd already accepted Xath's movement and continued the story before entirely removing that post and writing a new one. It was a mistake just as I did, but I did not edit to remove the consequences of that mistake.
This is entirely unfair and I hope you can see that. In my mind and I hope in yours, posting a message and then removing it is entirely unethical in this case.
Furthermore, THERE WAS NO FOLLOW UP SHOT. He was drawing the blaster and never pulled the trigger. Not an autohit.

I didn't edit because I saw your post, I edited cuz I noticed you didn't say anything to stop the autohit. On top of that, you could still try to force rage while at the table, so there's not much changing for your tactic. And as long as my post hasn't been locked in, I can still edit my post as much as I want. And if you've ever held a gun before, flicking a safety/switch really doesn't take as much time as turning around on one leg and trying to attack.

In case that wasn't enough, Arden's right hand was already drawing his other pistol for a follow-up shot if the Sith managed to somehow avoid a point-blank shot like that.

As for the autohit itself, I mentioned quite clearly that Arden was drawing for a follow up shot. That itself is an indication that he was gonna fire and Xath also fulfilled in the scenario in which he'd fire again.

 

[DarkSaber]

Found some RP rules from the site.
For gun combat, state
"1) how many shots are being fired (do NOT say "and then he fired a spray of shots" as this is entirely too vague) 2) what weapon is being used (if carrying multiple firearms) 3) what range the shot is being fired at 4) what part of the body is being aimed at." You merely stated he started to draw a gun, which does not fulfill number one or four. Grabbing a gun is not firing it, contrary to apparent popular belief.
It's like saying, I have the lighstaber so that implies I swung it at you. You ended up stating these in the post with the autohit, which is not legal given these rules. Please edit accordingly; I'm fine with you firing again but it's not an autohit.

Also, as to editing the post, it's fine by me but I already had a response completely written out in which you would've had little chance to survive. Though it was not intentional, it was "altering your characters actions to avoid a hidden bomb that your character would have no knowledge of." I'd just appreciate it if you wouldn't do that in the future.
@KinkyPrawn

 

[DarkSaber]

@Dread
I understand where Lilith is coming from, but according to site rules, PvP should be "kept equal if possible." Two against one is already unfair; a third PC hopping in is completely unequal. It's also entirely possible to prevent that, so please don't jump in.

Also, Xath has no idea who Kai is and it was Kai's own fault for not revealing that even when he knew Xath was a Sith.

 

[Dread]

@Dread
I understand where Lilith is coming from, but according to site rules, PvP should be "kept equal if possible." Two against one is already unfair; a third PC hopping in is completely unequal. It's also entirely possible to prevent that, so please don't jump in.

If possible. Lilith has every reason to be livid about Xath's actions. He is hurting the Sith faction in multiple ways. There is no way she wouldn't get involved. It'd be OOC for her not to. My request is that you consider going with the flow and simply see whatever story comes out of it. Even if your character is captured he cannot be killed. This is a DD thread.

 

[DarkSaber]

Hey all,
I've decided to drop all disputes and attempt to diffuse the thread. I apologize for any unsolicited behavior.
@Darasuum @Dread @KinkyPrawn @Insalius

 

[Dread]

Hey all,
I've decided to drop all disputes and attempt to diffuse the thread. I apologize for any unsolicited behavior.
@Darasuum @Dread @KinkyPrawn @Insalius

Thank you, Darksaber.

In the future, I hope to see PvPs like this be more cooperative. Attempt to roll with the flow as much as possible and if you have to dispute something, try to meet people half way. Consider the stories that can spawn from a thread like this, including from defeat.

 

[Darasuum]

To keep there from being too many people in this thread I've switched it to ask. @Dread @KinkyPrawn @DarkSaber @Insalius @Wit @Phoenix

Still open to letting Phoe join just don't want any more after that.

 

[Phoenix]

To keep there from being too many people in this thread I've switched it to ask. @Dread @KinkyPrawn @DarkSaber @Insalius @Wit @Phoenix

Still open to letting Phoe join just don't want any more after that.

Well at a minimum we should be able to bring in one more person. At best it's a 3v1v2 and at worst a 5v2

 

[Darasuum]

Well at a minimum we should be able to bring in one more person. At best it's a 3v1v2 and at worst a 5v2

Sure.

 

[DarkSaber]

Hey ya'll; I'm currently bleeding out from losing 2 limbs so plzzzz don't take too long :P

 

[KinkyPrawn]

Hey ya'll; I'm currently bleeding out from losing 2 limbs so plzzzz don't take too long :P

Was planning on cauterizing Xath's leg in my next post...depending on the new arrivals, of course >_>

 

[DarkSaber]

Thanks @KinkyPrawn lol.

 

[Sreeya]

Hey ya'll; I'm currently bleeding out from losing 2 limbs so plzzzz don't take too long :P

You can't die in this thread as has been pointed out already. 'Bleeding out' is not a thing in a DD thread. If you wanna electively have your char die anyway, that's entirely different. >_>

 

[DarkSaber]

You can't die in this thread as has been pointed out already. 'Bleeding out' is not a thing in a DD thread. If you wanna electively have your char die anyway, that's entirely different. >_>

Ik, more of a joke. That's why I didn't tag anyone cuz I didn't want to randomly annoy people. Sorry :/

 

[Sreeya]

Ik, more of a joke. That's why I didn't tag anyone cuz I didn't want to randomly annoy people. Sorry :/

No worries, I just don't want you to think you have to kill him off or something lol just have him as a nice little prop in the middle of chaos

 

[Darasuum]

Tots derped on the posting order. I don't know if I should delete or not.

sorry, help