10 reason why Star Wars is better...

[jedigirl444]

Ten Reasons Star Wars is Better Than Star Trek


10. In the Star Wars universe, weapons are rarely set on "stun."

09. The Death Star doesn't care if a world is class "M" or not.

08. After resisting the Imperial torture droid and Darth Vader, Princess Leia still looked fresh and desirable. After some Cardassian torture and starvation, Captain Picard looked like hell.

07. The bizarre aliens in the Mos Eisley cantina would make fun of Spock's pointy ears.

06. Luke Skywalker is not obsessed with sleeping with every female alien he encounters.

05. "A long time ago in a galaxy far, far away" just sounds cooler than "These are the voyages of the starship Enterprise."

04. Captain Picard pilots the Enterprise through an asteroid belt at one-quarter impulse power. Han Solo floors it.

03. The starship Enterprise needs a huge engine room with an anti-matter unit and a crew of 20 just to go into warp. The Millennium Falcon does the same thing with R2-D2 and a Wookie.

02. Darth Vader could choke the entire Borg collective with one glance.

01. One word: lightsabers.

(found them on this one site)

 

[Kunoichi]

I agree with every single one.

 

[Astra de Aurora]

HELL YEAH!

 

[jedigirl444]

wow your excited

 

[Hassan]

-_-

 

[Astra de Aurora]

<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(Nima Luroon/ Hannah Romani @ Mar 23 2006, 03:50 PM) [snapback]45822[/snapback]</div>

wow your excited
[/b]

You noticed?

 

[jedigirl444]

ya sort of

 

[Sovereign]

Old.

 

[Leonidas]

Lol....so true, so true.

 

[Hassan]

urgh. Fleet CGI is better in Star Trek.

better directed, better story wise and stuff -_-

but bleh :/

 

[Ghost]

LOL that was too funny

especially the last 3

 

[Scurge]

i agree with everything up there.

<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(aowc02 @ Mar 23 2006, 06:55 PM) [snapback]45830[/snapback]</div>

urgh. Fleet CGI is better in Star Trek.

better directed, better story wise and stuff -_-

but bleh :/
[/b]

What is this Herrsay?Get HIM!!!!!!

 

[Hassan]

urgh im not going to enter a geek debate. As much as i would love to, this has been debated again, and again and again... for the past 20 years since New Hope and the founding of startrek.

Every single debate ended the same: People flaming eachother.

 

[charles-k-f]

Am I the only one that knows how to spell WOOKIEE? Or KASHYYYK? :9: :4: :18: Anywho... I like Next Gen and Enterprise, other than that, to hell with Star Trek. I'll run circles around trekkies with my 'saber.


Oh and Star Trek has "Disentegrators."
Star Wars has "Disruptors" and they can 'Disentegrate' if you're not carefull.

Play the PC game Jedi Knight: Jedi Academy, and you'll know what I'm talking about.

 

[Brandon Rhea]

This is very, very old.

 

[Cyril Khan]

funny... though star wars and star trek is hard debate... overall they are near equal.

Star Trek has no weapon like a lightsaber... though the borg would adapt to its power... {sw partial advantage}

Phasers are more powerful than blasters because they fire a beam... and the can be set to vaporize {st advantage}

Star Trek torpedos are photon and quantum... yet star wars has Proton... on a damage scale Star Wars missiles are more dangerous. {sw advantage}

Star Trek ship phasers lock on their targets, star wars turrets are usually manually. {st advantage}

Star Trek shuttles would be crushed by Star Wars X-wings {sw advantage}

Star Trek has the ability to "beam" people up scotty... star wars has to travel to the planet via space craft. {st advantage}


Like I said... it is even... I took part in a full comparision of the two... they took parts of one movie and compared it to the other... it main came out even... though some fields weren't covered... the outcome was close but star wars was given the edge... mainly because of the force

 

[Ser Yorick]

<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(Jedi Knight Chafe Buorr @ Mar 23 2006, 07:12 PM) [snapback]45842[/snapback]</div>

Am I the only one that knows how to spell WOOKIEE? Or KASHYYYK?[/b]

No you are not alone, lol
I've been spelling it correct like that forever now, and people tell ME I'm spelling it wrong, lmao

 

[Empress]

06. Luke Skywalker is not obsessed with sleeping with every female alien he encounters.
[/b]

no, But Lando is




Star trek is too.....too clean for me, or was before Rondeberry died,,hell untill he died they could not produce DS-9 because the story was " too violent and war based " for his taste

with SW I see more human emotion, and personal human elements, where its more the character that drives it,,, ST is mainly tech.. in my mind those obsessed with technology issues are the worst geeks ever
*thinks back too the Geeks on SouthPark and the Star Trek argument*

actually over all, I dont really care, Star Wars Has a better, more natural feeling human story that ST lacks...and I think StarGate has a better long drawn out story archs ( 10 seasons, and every episode is directly tied into everysingle episode before it



I like a good story, I give a crap less who has what power, what ship does what, that ... thats just sad in my book to narrow sombodys creation by worrying about those little things

 

[Kalin Morne]

You know, realistically, Borg wouldn't be able to 'adapt' to energy weapons. And if they could, why didn't they start to use Kinetic weapons like Rail-guns, that would SO ruin the Borg's day.

 

[Raze]

:33: