3-S 'Elite' Slugthrower

Status
Not open for further replies.

Spud

Random Tubor
SWRP Writer
Joined
Nov 3, 2015
Messages
171
Reaction score
40
s-1948.jpg

Affiliation: Replica/Antique Arms Dealers

Ownership: Alistair Stroud, potentially usable by anyone that would actually buy one and refit it for lethal action.

Intent: This weapon is meant to be used as a concealable and nigh-silent close range assassination firearm. It is not designed to be used on the battlefield but in situations where the wielder wants to remain hidden, such as while infiltrating an outpost, home, corporate building, and so on. Ideally their target would be unarmored (at very least without helmet) and is too far away/in too open an area to use blade/hand/other melee range lethal techniques.

Model: 3-S Elite

Type: Slugthrower

Size: The 3-S's overall length is 165mm (6.5in) with a 35mm (1.38in) barrel, from the base of the grip to the top of the barrel it's 132mm (5.2in). It weighs 700g (1lb 8.7oz) without the cartridge, 850g (1lb 14oz) with the cartridge, and 906g (just under 2lbs) fully loaded.

Composition: Basic durasteel components and a rubber coated grip. It's possible to find models that have been modified with various decorative grips and barrels.

Range: Maximum effective range is 20m, maximum minor injury range is 40m.

Ammunition Capacity: 6 round cartridge.

Description: What makes this weapon unique when compared to other slug-throwing pistols is actually that it was designed only to use a very special type of ammunition, in fact the ammunition is what gives the pistol its extremely quiet nature, other than that it essentially works like any other rugged dual action pistol. The ammunition this gun uses has an internal piston and a propelling charge to deliver the force of the blast to the slug, after the slug leaves the casing the piston seals off the hole preventing any gas from escaping. This eliminates muzzle flash, smoke, and almost all of the noise caused by a typical slugthrower. This ammunition is extremely hard to find on the market but those with the related skills and necessary knowledge can make their own, however if this process isn't done with precision gas may still escape the casing or the ammunition may simply explode in the firing chamber. The drawback of this weapon is its lack of penetrative power, it cannot pierce even the lightest of armor designed to resist ballistic force, and its severely reduced effective range compared to blaster pistols. While this weapon is usable underwater its effective range is essentially reduced to point blank.

Features:
  • Rugged 'all terrain' design.
  • Easy to disassemble and clean.
  • Semi-Automatic.
  • Almost entirely silent.
  • Relatively small and easy to conceal.
  • Stock 'dot and bar' sights.
  • Supports holographic and reflex sight attachments.

(*Note: I wasn't sure if the ammunition would fall under its own profile or not, it's designed specifically for use with this weapon but theoretically any gunsmith could adapt other slugthrowers to use it. If it needs its own thing let me know and I'll make it.)
 

Clayton

SWRP Writer
Joined
Aug 5, 2013
Messages
4,185
Reaction score
1,425
Really, any pistol's effective range underwater would be point blank. And there isn't any drawback to this that isn't covered by the already existing nerfs to slugthrowers.
 

Spud

Random Tubor
SWRP Writer
Joined
Nov 3, 2015
Messages
171
Reaction score
40
Sorry for the late response, been bed/couch-ridden for the past few weeks. Should I change it to an ammunition submission then with say 30-50% reduction in the gun's effective range for whatever gun you use it with or I should I just reduce the range of this gun by that much and state that it's a result of the ammunition? Something like 10m/20m lethal/minor?
 

Jabonicus

Who?
SWRP Writer
Joined
Mar 3, 2015
Messages
1,197
Reaction score
660
Gun's are practically non-lethal underwater. There's too much resistance, high velocity bullets make it around a foot, maybe two, underwater, before they stop. They lose any lethality long before that though. In short, contrary to what movies say, bullets are useless underwater.
 

Andrewza

Mr Dyslexia
SWRP Supporter
SWRP Writer
Joined
Jan 4, 2012
Messages
5,934
Reaction score
648

Spud

Random Tubor
SWRP Writer
Joined
Nov 3, 2015
Messages
171
Reaction score
40
Aside from guns/ammo designed specifically for underwater use the general rule of thumb is the higher the velocity the worse the bullet does with water, a low velocity pistol round will travel further than a high velocity sniper round which would wind up practically shredding itself due to the resistance, even so unless designed specifically for UW usage then they usually only go a few meters at absolute best. The ammunition this gun uses is subsonic, low velocity, and it'll likely kill at point blank range against an unarmored target but drop off harmlessly beyond that.

On a side note I'm not sure how this came up lol, I believe Clayton was just saying that it isn't any more of a drawback than any other pistol in that regards.
 

Clayton

SWRP Writer
Joined
Aug 5, 2013
Messages
4,185
Reaction score
1,425
Honestly this is kinda...weird and maybe a little too complex for slugthrowers this TL.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top