Men don't cheat, they are only following nature
- Thread starter Empress
- Start date
- Status
Well i dont need a survey to tell what human nature is.... most wimen have known this for god knows how long and use it to manipulate men (most guys being stupid enough to fall for it) ..... come on deny it then females.....? :20:
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(Emoir @ Dec 13 2005, 11:27 AM) [snapback]3457[/snapback]</div>
Well alot of women seem to think they can manipulate ALL men and that men can't do the same to them, which is completely wrong. I'm not saying you can't manipulate men, seeing as many men will do anything for sex, but if you are smart men you will be indifferent to sex. If they know you always want it they can use that but if you don't ever want to do it then they can use that but if you don't care if you don't get any for a while but still enjoy it when you get it then a women has little to manipulate you with (unless she has something else on you). To manipulate some women, just buy them stuff and/or tell them you love them even if you don't mean it. Quite simple really.
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(Kentos/Adamis @ Dec 12 2005, 10:36 PM) [snapback]3462[/snapback]</div>
Simpley put, its called the "Forbbidon fruit" tatic, or the "Hard to get" tatic, of corse don't forget the "Reverse reverse physcology" tatic. And never forget the "Reverse, reverse, reverse, reverse physcology" tatic... :13:
- Joined
- Nov 27, 2005
- Messages
- 17,704
- Reaction score
- 75
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(Emoir @ Dec 12 2005, 10:40 PM) [snapback]3467[/snapback]</div>
I don't know what you would be meaning by a clenical study, Looking at the three differant type of sperm, and exactly what they do each is evendent just looking under a microscope,, you can do it at home yourself if you need too, this is basic biology, and it is a physical thing, well, and chemical I guess,,, does not say anything about social structuring, that depends on your cultural background... I DONT have any links, sence I pulled that out of one of my old text books , though recently saw it on TV a few months ago when TLC did " the science of sex" which covered that too
And I don't know why my sig got nuked, it was not vulgar, nor was it that large * infact I see ALOT of larger sigs than mine*
I don't know what you would be meaning by a clenical study, Looking at the three differant type of sperm, and exactly what they do each is evendent just looking under a microscope,, you can do it at home yourself if you need too, this is basic biology, and it is a physical thing, well, and chemical I guess,,, does not say anything about social structuring, that depends on your cultural background... I DONT have any links, sence I pulled that out of one of my old text books , though recently saw it on TV a few months ago when TLC did " the science of sex" which covered that too
And I don't know why my sig got nuked, it was not vulgar, nor was it that large * infact I see ALOT of larger sigs than mine*
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(Adena @ Dec 13 2005, 03:33 AM) [snapback]3720[/snapback]</div>
How conveniant, well perhaps you could give me the name of this text book? I'm quite interested. And your signature was nuked because it stretched the page.
How conveniant, well perhaps you could give me the name of this text book? I'm quite interested. And your signature was nuked because it stretched the page.
- Joined
- Nov 27, 2005
- Messages
- 17,704
- Reaction score
- 75
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(Sabre @ Dec 13 2005, 10:17 AM) [snapback]3758[/snapback]</div>
The book is Human Sexuality a composium of micro biology
now, I did dig up a few links,,
http://www.science-frontiers.com/sf104/sf104p02.htm
basically search on sperm types, and seek and destroy sperm,, ALSO Get Sperm Wars : the science of Sex:
Amazon.com
If you've ever looked upon sperm as a little army of white-coated soldiers setting off to sack and pillage a barely pregnable fortress . . . well, you'd be right, according to this fascinating new book. Dr. Robin Baker, who has studied sperm and cervical mucus in much greater detail than anyone would've thought necessary, has come to some startling conclusions: that less than 1 percent of sperm is actually designed to fertilize an egg (the rest are there to block other men's sperm), and that 4 to 10 percent of all children born to married couples are in fact the offspring of other men, usually of higher socioeconomic status, with whom the mother had a short-term relationship. --This text refers to an out of print or unavailable edition of this title.
Journal of Sex Research
The descriptions of what occurs biologically during sexual activity directly challenge many notions we were taught, and may continue to teach to our students, regarding male and female bodily response during and after sexual activity. Even such sacred notions as sperm existing with the "goal" of seeking and fertilizing the prized egg are turned on their head. Baker describes at least three types of distinctly different sperm, each with an apparently different mission. The "egg-getters," those who match our usual characterization of the typical sperm, in actuality comprise only 1% or less of the sperm in a man's ejaculate. Other sperm appear to function as "blockers" of women's cervical crypts or "egg-killers" who attack foreign sperm. Baker also discusses the discovery of specialized sperm that may kill a man's own egg-getters under certain prescribed circumstances.
:4: :16:
Trust me I won't make anyclaims unless there is any backing to it, also check the journal of medical science
The book is Human Sexuality a composium of micro biology
now, I did dig up a few links,,
http://www.science-frontiers.com/sf104/sf104p02.htm
basically search on sperm types, and seek and destroy sperm,, ALSO Get Sperm Wars : the science of Sex:
Amazon.com
If you've ever looked upon sperm as a little army of white-coated soldiers setting off to sack and pillage a barely pregnable fortress . . . well, you'd be right, according to this fascinating new book. Dr. Robin Baker, who has studied sperm and cervical mucus in much greater detail than anyone would've thought necessary, has come to some startling conclusions: that less than 1 percent of sperm is actually designed to fertilize an egg (the rest are there to block other men's sperm), and that 4 to 10 percent of all children born to married couples are in fact the offspring of other men, usually of higher socioeconomic status, with whom the mother had a short-term relationship. --This text refers to an out of print or unavailable edition of this title.
Journal of Sex Research
The descriptions of what occurs biologically during sexual activity directly challenge many notions we were taught, and may continue to teach to our students, regarding male and female bodily response during and after sexual activity. Even such sacred notions as sperm existing with the "goal" of seeking and fertilizing the prized egg are turned on their head. Baker describes at least three types of distinctly different sperm, each with an apparently different mission. The "egg-getters," those who match our usual characterization of the typical sperm, in actuality comprise only 1% or less of the sperm in a man's ejaculate. Other sperm appear to function as "blockers" of women's cervical crypts or "egg-killers" who attack foreign sperm. Baker also discusses the discovery of specialized sperm that may kill a man's own egg-getters under certain prescribed circumstances.
:4: :16:
Trust me I won't make anyclaims unless there is any backing to it, also check the journal of medical science
- Joined
- Nov 27, 2005
- Messages
- 17,704
- Reaction score
- 75
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(Emoir @ Dec 14 2005, 12:59 PM) [snapback]4290[/snapback]</div>
there are SOME notions about it that are still being debated over all, but when you see the types it's pretty obvious whats going on,, Most of the recearch has been coming through welsh, and scot recearchers,, though reguardless of how you look at it it simply comes out as a survival of the fittest situation
and I do point out this is a physical trait Im not trying to alter how social situations are or anything, seems it's just one of our ancient primitive functions that has not phased out * and with a world where the question of " who's ma' babies daddy" is pretty common.. I figured it has SOME relevence,,, and perhaps there are clues into male fertility problems
there are SOME notions about it that are still being debated over all, but when you see the types it's pretty obvious whats going on,, Most of the recearch has been coming through welsh, and scot recearchers,, though reguardless of how you look at it it simply comes out as a survival of the fittest situation
and I do point out this is a physical trait Im not trying to alter how social situations are or anything, seems it's just one of our ancient primitive functions that has not phased out * and with a world where the question of " who's ma' babies daddy" is pretty common.. I figured it has SOME relevence,,, and perhaps there are clues into male fertility problems
- Status