Texas law superceeds UN law

Venom

I'm here!
SWRP Writer
Joined
May 11, 2006
Messages
5,513
Reaction score
3
I hate Texas, a lot, and I can definitely see this causing problems. At the same time though, I cant really say that Im bothered by what the guy's consequences were.
 

Sovereign

SWRP Writer
Joined
Dec 7, 2005
Messages
24,621
Reaction score
20
the death penalty is idiotic. the title of this thread makes no sense by the way
 

Andreus Makaryk

SWRP Writer
Joined
Jun 28, 2010
Messages
1,217
Reaction score
3
It's all well and good until some American gets tried in RandomCrapistan, is not allowed access to consular officials to assist him, and is convicted in a sham trial.
 

Raider

SWRP Writer
Joined
Dec 6, 2005
Messages
2,257
Reaction score
31
It's all well and good until some American gets tried in RandomCrapistan, is not allowed access to consular officials to assist him, and is convicted in a sham trial.
I will support "RandomCrapistan's" sovereign right to put to death an American and any other foreign national who rapes and murders one of its citizens on their own soil.
 

Andreus Makaryk

SWRP Writer
Joined
Jun 28, 2010
Messages
1,217
Reaction score
3

What goes around comes around.

Read the article. Texas denied a Mexican citizen access to consular officials that could have assisted him. The federal government's argument was that such violated the Vienna Conventions.

Note that this was a simple problem with a simple fix--let him speak to the kriffin' consulate.

SCOTUS basically said "we don't care." You all are cheering that decision. I'm pointing out that when an American gets arrested in some other random third-world country with a crappy court system, that government can then proceed to lock up the American whist denying the American consular assistance, all the while claiming "America does this exact same thing, so why should we care about an American's purported rights?" What goes around comes around.

And I'd bet that most of those that believe this is the correct outcome would be up in arms that ZOMG IT HAPPENED TO AN AMERICAN!!11!!
 

Brand

SWRP Writer
Joined
Jan 23, 2011
Messages
1,873
Reaction score
2
I will support "RandomCrapistan's" sovereign right to put to death an American and any other foreign national who rapes and murders one of its citizens on their own soil.

Exactly.
 

Raider

SWRP Writer
Joined
Dec 6, 2005
Messages
2,257
Reaction score
31
What goes around comes around.

Read the article. Texas denied a Mexican citizen access to consular officials that could have assisted him. The federal government's argument was that such violated the Vienna Conventions.

Note that this was a simple problem with a simple fix--let him speak to the kriffin' consulate.

SCOTUS basically said "we don't care." You all are cheering that decision. I'm pointing out that when an American gets arrested in some other random third-world country with a crappy court system, that government can then proceed to lock up the American whist denying the American consular assistance, all the while claiming "America does this exact same thing, so why should we care about an American's purported rights?" What goes around comes around.

And I'd bet that most of those that believe this is the correct outcome would be up in arms that ZOMG IT HAPPENED TO AN AMERICAN!!11!!
Congress has not ratified the Vienna Convention treaty. The US and the states are not bound to follow it.
 

Random Hero

Derp
SWRP Writer
Joined
Oct 21, 2008
Messages
4,235
Reaction score
0
Do you think that the men that killed Brian Terry and many other Americans will ever be bought to justice in Mexico?

Seriously doubt it.

I don't care if he was American, Mexican, French, Russia, Mongolian, Pakistani, etc, etc, etc.

He got what he deserved.
 

Andreus Makaryk

SWRP Writer
Joined
Jun 28, 2010
Messages
1,217
Reaction score
3
Wow, unexpected consistency is unexpected.:CHappy

And yes, technically the US never got around to actually ratifying Vienna. Weaseling through those technicalities has some potentially nasty consequences, though.

Would it really have been that difficult to allow this guy a phone call to the Mexican Consulate?

Is denying a simple communication worth the loss of international good-will and giving dictatorship countries political cover to do the same exact thing to Americans that happen to be on their soil?

I'm inclined to believe the balance of consequences leans towards letting the guy make the phone call (and note: he still probably would have been convicted without all this fuss to boot).
 

Samara

Moirai
SWRP Writer
Joined
Nov 10, 2010
Messages
1,356
Reaction score
0

RandomCrapistan: "Yousa killed ****encia, Yousa will go to jail"
Raider: "No, I didn't" (You didn't)
Raider: "I demand access to consular officials"
RandomCrapistan americanhatecourt: "No"
RandomCrapistan americanhatecourt: "Youse'yer ye did it hurr hurr"

Court finds Raider guilty, Raider is imprisioned.

Raider: "I demand access to consular officials, you can't do this!"

*Nobody cares, Raider spends 30 years dying in a crappy jail until he passes out*

Everyone: Yes, excellent, perfect!
 

Brand

SWRP Writer
Joined
Jan 23, 2011
Messages
1,873
Reaction score
2
RandomCrapistan: "Yousa killed ****encia, Yousa will go to jail"
Raider: "No, I didn't" (You didn't)
Raider: "I demand access to consular officials"
RandomCrapistan americanhatecourt: "No"
RandomCrapistan americanhatecourt: "Youse'yer ye did it hurr hurr"

Court finds Raider guilty, Raider is imprisioned.

Raider: "I demand access to consular officials, you can't do this!"

*Nobody cares, Raider spends 30 years dying in a crappy jail until he passes out*

Everyone: Yes, excellent, perfect!

If Raider raped and killed a 16 year old girl of RandomCrapistan I think he deserves to have the death penalty inflicted upon him or spend a lifetime in jail.

"If you commit the most heinous of crimes in Texas, you can expect to face the ultimate penalty under our laws, as in this case," Texas spokeswoman Katherine Cesinger said.
 
Top