Gaba's ban. (APRIL FOOLS!)

[Dmitri]

I blame the clinton administration. Both of them.

And will GABA be unbanned a year from now since the law no longer applies at 14?

Was already addressed.

 

[Bee-Den Iosis]

While it is harsh, Admins are just enforcing...a law...so yeah. Not their fault.

 

[Phil]

While it is harsh, Admins are just enforcing...a law...so yeah. Not their fault.

Not what I am getting at. I'm saying people shouldn't be praising the staff for banning someone who has been our friend, fellow RPer and member of this site.

 

[Sovereign]

How bout you people who know Gabby outside this website continue to be her friend despite this thing? Real friends stay friends regardless of age.

Hi, everyone. My name is Sovereign, and I've been a member of this site of SWRP since 2005. I'm a user of this site just like you, but I'm also a parent, and as a parent, I cannot help but to be concerned when I read posts such as this one. If you have young children like I do, then I urge to please report this post to federal authorities. The Federal Bureau of Investigation's office for Victim Assistance serves as the central repository for contact information, notification preference, and victim impact statement submission preference for identified victims of child abuse. Please. Keep our streets safe.

 

[Green Ranger]

You people are acting like she's the only one who's ever lied about their life before.

I recall a time where I said I was several years older then I really was, worked the night shift at Taco Bell and had a red head ex-girlfriend.

How bout you people who know Gabby outside this website continue to be her friend despite this thing? Real friends stay friends regardless of age.

Big difference - you weren't under a legal age to be on the site at the time. Apples and oranges, buddy.

 

[TAC]

I never really liked her anyways.

 

[Phil]

Big difference - you weren't under a legal age to be on the site at the time. Apples and oranges, buddy.

Missed the point. I was not talking about the legal system or whatever it is.

This isn't like when Syn got banned, he was more or less disliked/hated by all. Gabby is/was not.

 

[Vulpes]

This is why I support background checks prior to joining the forum. The membership rules are too lenient as they are.

 

[Green Ranger]

Whether you like it or not, she lied to the entire community for a long time. I think members are completely justified if they are upset by that.

 

[Phil]

This is why I support background checks prior to joining the forum. The membership rules are too lenient as they are.

A background check for a Star Wars fourm? Unnecessary.

 

[TheSilentWind]

This is why I support background checks prior to joining the forum. The membership rules are too lenient as they are.

While I might understand why you are supporting this, I think background checks are going to far.

 

[Raydo]

I think it is crucial to the healing process to have an open RP thread where her character is banished from the Galaxy and set a drift in a life pod. We can all throw rotten fruit and vegetables at Ebberla as she is led away!

 

[Vulpes]

A background check for a Star Wars fourm? Unnecessary.

Clearly it is... we need to think of the children. The overbearing sexual and violent themes of this community are no place for the mind of a 12 year old. I find it offensive that you think that it is appropriate for underaged members to be a part of this community. a Background check will do the site some good.

 

[Ush]

A background check for a Star Wars fourm? Unnecessary.

Look at what it let through! A seven year old! On this site! We have discussed mature topics!

Also, Laurent's here.

 

[Vulpes]

Anyone who does not support universal SWRP background checks is hiding something.

 

[Sovereign]

If you don't believe in background checks for the site, then you probably don't think they're necessary at airports. What's the point of checking passenger's luggages? After all, according to your point of view, we can just rely on them being honest. Such a pre-9/11 mentality is dangerous.

 

[Phil]

Clearly it is... we need to think of the children. The overbearing sexual and violent themes of this community are no place for the mind of a 12 year old. I find it offensive that you think that it is appropriate for underaged members to be a part of this community. a Background check will do the site some good.

Then maybe parents should monitor what their kids do on the internet more carefully.

Or maybe we should just all better ourselves?

Look at what it let through! A seven year old! On this site! We have discussed mature topics!

Also, Laurent's here.

Sin is nothing more then an attention seeking troll who likes fishing for arguments. How and why he still lurks here is anyone's guess. But I highly suggest you all just ignore his attempts at attention or argument fishing. It's what I do for the most part.

 

[Clayton]

Phil, you're just kind of trolling at this point. That's Laurent's schtick, not yours. Learn your place.

 

[Green Ranger]

You can all knock it off.

 

[Miz]

I'm confused.

Am I mad that a twelve year old could right better than me, or a twelve year old were leading the Jedi for so long.