- Joined
- May 11, 2010
- Messages
- 703
- Reaction score
- 0
In today's paper I read an article that really threw me for a loop. In Canada, as well as the United States, men are asked when donating blood to state if they have had sex with another man. The rationale behind the law is that having sex with another man increases the risk of HIV/AIDS.
As a man who's had sex with another man I found that to be incredibly narrow minded, and a little offensive.
Am I barred from giving blood because I have AIDS? No.
Am I barred from giving blood because the person I had sex with has AIDS? No.
I'm barred from giving blood, and potentially saving lives because I had sex with another man.
AIDS isn't a "gay" disease. Anyone can get AIDS. Man or woman. These are things I learned in phys-ed class years ago, but apparently the same government that approves my education hasn't taken the class.
The subject of the article was a man who's been sued for lying about his sex life to give blood and help those in need. He's challenging the policy, and we'll get a supreme court ruling this summer. I'm behind him.
As a man who's had sex with another man I found that to be incredibly narrow minded, and a little offensive.
Am I barred from giving blood because I have AIDS? No.
Am I barred from giving blood because the person I had sex with has AIDS? No.
I'm barred from giving blood, and potentially saving lives because I had sex with another man.
AIDS isn't a "gay" disease. Anyone can get AIDS. Man or woman. These are things I learned in phys-ed class years ago, but apparently the same government that approves my education hasn't taken the class.
The subject of the article was a man who's been sued for lying about his sex life to give blood and help those in need. He's challenging the policy, and we'll get a supreme court ruling this summer. I'm behind him.