Which Trilogy should have gone first?

Which Trilogy should have gone first?

  • Don't know

    Votes: 0 0.0%

  • Total voters
    4

Adamis

SWRP Writer
Joined
Dec 7, 2005
Messages
2,337
Reaction score
0
Ok so basicly which do you think would have been better to have gone first, the New Trilogy or the Original Trilogy. If the New won had gone first we would have the (slight) surprise of Anakin marrying Padme, Anakin falling and becoming Darth Vadar but we would miss out on the surprise of "Luke, I am your Father!" and "Leia's my sister."

So what do you guys think?
 

Brandon Rhea

Shadow in the Starlight
Administrator
Joined
Nov 27, 2005
Messages
67,946
Reaction score
3,861
The original. Not because of the suprises, but because the prequels would have been impossible to do back in the day.
 

Green Ranger

DRAGONZORD!
Administrator
SWRP Supporter
Joined
Dec 6, 2005
Messages
21,029
Reaction score
2,804
The Original Trilogy. I still watch the OT first before going back to the Prequel trilogy. It's like a flashback of sorts for me. Plus watchign the Prequels first kills almost every plot twist in the OT, no matter how many times I watch it.

I still think that they could have made ROTS more complimentary to those who feel like watching the prequels first.
 

Johnnysaurus Rex

Infinity & Beyond
SWRP Writer
Joined
Dec 6, 2005
Messages
9,807
Reaction score
229
I say the surprises should keep the original up. "I am your father!" No friggin duh I knew. Luke and Leia are brother and sister?! Ya they are twins. Plus ya it wouldn't have looked as cool but I just kinda hate how half is dated but has a great story and one looks freakin awesome but is a bit of a dissapointment
 

Matt

London Calling.
SWRP Writer
Joined
Nov 27, 2005
Messages
26,916
Reaction score
10
Ot is and will always be the greatest trilogy of movies ever.
 

Josh

SWRP Writer
Joined
Aug 13, 2006
Messages
436
Reaction score
0
The OT.

They need to add a clip of that Binks bugger being blown up though.
 

Brandon Rhea

Shadow in the Starlight
Administrator
Joined
Nov 27, 2005
Messages
67,946
Reaction score
3,861
Please explain how adding in Jar Jar Binks dying would NOT be a deliberate attempt to please a minority of Star Wars fans that would mean absolutely nothing in context to the story of any of the three movies, the OT as a whole and the Saga as a whole.
 

sithboy7

SWRP Writer
Joined
Dec 8, 2005
Messages
14
Reaction score
0
I think the orginals are good as first, beause they dont really explain the Republic or the Jedi in the new ones.
 

jediduncan

SWRP Writer
Joined
Dec 8, 2005
Messages
2,395
Reaction score
0
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(Brandon Rhea @ Jun 14 2007, 03:41 AM) [snapback]167369[/snapback]</div>
Please explain how adding in Jar Jar Binks dying would NOT be a deliberate attempt to please a minority of Star Wars fans that would mean absolutely nothing in context to the story of any of the three movies, the OT as a whole and the Saga as a whole.[/b]

I agree with Bac, they should edit them to kill Jar Jar Binks.
 

Matt

London Calling.
SWRP Writer
Joined
Nov 27, 2005
Messages
26,916
Reaction score
10
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(Brandon Rhea @ Jun 14 2007, 04:41 AM) [snapback]167369[/snapback]</div>
Please explain how adding in Jar Jar Binks dying would NOT be a deliberate attempt to please a minority of Star Wars fans that would mean absolutely nothing in context to the story of any of the three movies, the OT as a whole and the Saga as a whole.[/b]


Same reason he has a tiny role in 2 and 3.

Not only did he annoy EVERYONE...Many considered him to be racist.

Outside world effects star wars 101 :unworthy:
 
Top