Worst Sith of all time.

[Marf]

Darth Bane. Quite simply because he destroyed everything about the Sith that I personally liked before he showed up and ruined it with his Rule of Shit.

Count Dooku because he bores me to tears with every word that comes out of his mouth.

Ludo Kressh was a loser, but he was adorable and I love him for it.

Probably Naga Saddow.

**** you.

Just kidding, hun ;)

Sadow had major weaknesses which lead to his downfall, but he was one of the most talented Force users who ever lived. By that I mean, he had the widest variety of skills; battlefield warrior of perfect physical prowess who was also a master of alchemy, illusions, and who could blow up ****ing stars. One of his weaknesses though, was that he lacked the intelligence and caution to utilize those skills properly.

 

[GABA]

I think they're all pretty bad. I think it also reflects poorly on the mental health systems of an united galaxy and individual systems, especially those on more developed worlds. I am sure with proper availability of mental health care the galaxy wouldn't have to suffer through what could easily be prevented with proper therapies and medication. THANKS OBAMA.

 

[Brandon Rhea]

Anyone who Martha likes is the worst Sith of all time.

:anticipation:

 

[Marf]

Silence, Bacman. I know you're a Sadow fangirl too.

I actually adore fanon Sith way more than canon Sith.

Give me Audroti, Arcturus, Varek, and Andraste over Sadow, Kun or Malgus anyday.

 

[Pureblood-Sin]

Silence, Bacman. I know you're a Sadow fangirl too.

I actually adore fanon Sith way more than canon Sith.

Give me Audroti, Arcturus, Varek, and Andraste over Sadow, Kun or Malgus anyday.

The bonus being the their respective players gift them with the ultimate power no ancient Sith ever had...Common Sense and a storyline that doesn't guarantee their death. :mongo:

 

[Marf]

The bonus being the their respective players gift them with the ultimate power no ancient Sith ever had

On the contrary, the site has rules against Sadow-esque OP characters. Which is why most Sith chars stick to the skill sets of their respective classes (Warrior, Sorcerer, Assassin).

They're better because the writers have the chance to give them complexity, humanity and interesting and original traits that you usually won't find in canon.

 

[Flamjetxx]

I would say Maul was pretty bad, because of the fact that he was an amazing duelist (and I only see Maul having died permanently on Naboo), but he neglected to use any force powers at all. If he would have focused any bit more on his force abilities, rather than being a pure duelist, he would have an excellent advantage over any other duelist. The way he incorporates trakata with his dueling techniques was ingenious, but the only time he ever used force abilities was to open a door... SAD.

That and the fact that he was so arrogant that he let a Padawan beat him while he had the upper hand is the saddest thing I've ever seen. I'm just so disappointed because he had the potential. He had the potential to beat just about anyone in a duel if he would have learned more about the force. Like force lightening!!!

A close second would be Anakin (not Vader, but Anakin). Can you imagine a more heavily manipulated individual- and maybe he could still be considered a Jedi at that point, but he had killed a Ton of younglings and Windu, so...

He was just as arrogant as, if not more arrogant than Maul was, and gave Obi Wan yet another freebie! Obi Wan beat 2 of the highest potential Sith of his age because of the fact that he was WAAAAYYY smarter than them, knew his limitations, and was NOT arrogant. It just goes to show that you shouldn't overestimate yourself.

--Back to the topic- that Anakin was so heavily manipulated that he killed his own wife, left the Jedi for the Sith (to protect his wife?), and severely limited himself by getting chopped in half...

And considering Vader's abilities, you could only imagine what Vader would have been capable of if Anakin didn't screw up his body. With more voce abilities and mobility, I bet Vader would have taken out Sidious long ago... but then again, would Vader have learned his lesson about overestimating himself if he didn't get chopped in half by Obi Wan?

Either way-Just because they threw away their full potential:

1-Maul

2-Anakin

 

[Venom]

I kind of agree with the "they all suck" thought, personally think that Darth Sion is the absolute worst though.

 

[Miz]

Rule of Shit.

As much as I disagree you had me laughing my ass off in a testing environment.

 

[Warmonger]

Darth Bane. Quite simply because he destroyed everything about the Sith that I personally liked before he showed up and ruined it with his Rule of Shit.

Count Dooku because he bores me to tears with every word that comes out of his mouth.

Ludo Kressh was a loser, but he was adorable and I love him for it.


**** you.

Just kidding, hun ;)

Sadow had major weaknesses which lead to his downfall, but he was one of the most talented Force users who ever lived. By that I mean, he had the widest variety of skills; battlefield warrior of perfect physical prowess who was also a master of alchemy, illusions, and who could blow up ****ing stars. One of his weaknesses though, was that he lacked the intelligence and caution to utilize those skills properly.

Pff, whatever. Nihilus can suck the life and the Force out of a ****in' planet. Way more impressive, evil, and less needlessly destructive. :p That said, if it weren't for Saddow then the Sith probably wouldn't have been obliterated.

 

[Warmonger]

I would say Maul was pretty bad, because of the fact that he was an amazing duelist (and I only see Maul having died permanently on Naboo), but he neglected to use any force powers at all. If he would have focused any bit more on his force abilities, rather than being a pure duelist, he would have an excellent advantage over any other duelist. The way he incorporates trakata with his dueling techniques was ingenious, but the only time he ever used force abilities was to open a door... SAD.

That and the fact that he was so arrogant that he let a Padawan beat him while he had the upper hand is the saddest thing I've ever seen. I'm just so disappointed because he had the potential. He had the potential to beat just about anyone in a duel if he would have learned more about the force. Like force lightening!!!

A close second would be Anakin (not Vader, but Anakin). Can you imagine a more heavily manipulated individual- and maybe he could still be considered a Jedi at that point, but he had killed a Ton of younglings and Windu, so...

He was just as arrogant as, if not more arrogant than Maul was, and gave Obi Wan yet another freebie! Obi Wan beat 2 of the highest potential Sith of his age because of the fact that he was WAAAAYYY smarter than them, knew his limitations, and was NOT arrogant. It just goes to show that you shouldn't overestimate yourself.

--Back to the topic- that Anakin was so heavily manipulated that he killed his own wife, left the Jedi for the Sith (to protect his wife?), and severely limited himself by getting chopped in half...

And considering Vader's abilities, you could only imagine what Vader would have been capable of if Anakin didn't screw up his body. With more voce abilities and mobility, I bet Vader would have taken out Sidious long ago... but then again, would Vader have learned his lesson about overestimating himself if he didn't get chopped in half by Obi Wan?

Either way-Just because they threw away their full potential:

1-Maul

2-Anakin

I doubt Anakin/Vader/new Darth would have tried to kill Palpatine. There wouldn't have been any point. It isn't like Vader was your typical "I'll kill my Master and become the new Master" type of Sith.

 

[Raif]

Geist Weiss

:nom:

 

[Miz]

Geist Weiss:

I heard that Royston Spektor fellow was a complete pansy.

 

[Raif]

I heard that Royston Spektor fellow was a complete pansy.

Oh yeah, worst Sith of all time for sure, that Roy.

Sharp looking guy nonetheless. 10/10 would bang.

 

[Flamjetxx]

I doubt Anakin/Vader/new Darth would have tried to kill Palpatine. There wouldn't have been any point. It isn't like Vader was your typical "I'll kill my Master and become the new Master" type of Sith.

Well, you really never know. IF for whatever reason he never got thrown into that cumbersome suit, he may have felt more confident in his abilities, and tried to overthrow Sidious. Nearly every Sith's reason for falling to the Dark side is for the pursuit of power, and Anakin was no different. He wanted to learn what Sidious' master achieved- manipulation of the midachlorians to save the lives of those he loves from death- also some other reasons...

But we know for a fact that due to his killing of his wife and getting nearly killed by Obi Wan, he had a MAJOR aditude adjustment and a new perspective on life in general. We don't know for sure how his perception on life and attitude would have been like if he never got nearly killed by Obi Wan, or even killed Padme for that matter. He could have grown as pompous as Exar Kun, or he could have wised up, but still searched for the power he joined the dark side for in the first place.

I mean it would only be a matter of time before he finds out that Sidious doesn't actually have the power to bring back the dead, and Vader would be furious for the lies, perhaps angry enough (and confident enough) to challenge him? Whether he would win is another thought, because we truly don't know the extent of the potential he had.

--It is Possible for an alternate Universe Vader- who was never erected in the way that our Vader was- would have challenged Sidious... Eventually. Besides, it's tradition and essentially the whole purpose of the rule of two. The master trains the apprentice to eventually succeed him, when his apprentice supersedes his power.