I apologize for the delay, every time I was about to have time to reply this week something came up. I'm working on my reply now and it should be up within the hour, if that's alright...
Edit: Soo... my reply took longer than I thought, and it sucks, but it's there...
The fight lead to the kids. In which during the skirmish, the Jedi managed to save one, but the sith got the other >.>
Even trade. And with the hastiness of A/ the fight B/ Snikch's bomb barrage and C/ the forest soon threatening to engulf them all in flames, i think it serves about right.
I could always pose for a simple sith win, but that seems selfish, unless y'all agree...?
'holds out hand to shake' Official write up would be something like:
In the chaos and confusion of the blazing utumn forest the battle split, where the two 'lost' members had gone to try and snipe the children. Getting there, The place set up in an inferno, neither of them could carry both, at least with one each, the children would survive.
In the end, the ransom and power the sith would attain would only be half that if they had both childeren. And on the Jedis, one child was certainly saved, the other held to ransom, but at the very least, both lived. Mean while the fight in the forest became too 'heated' and the risk of a flash fire became too great. Forcing a retreat.
I think it's even and fair, and serves both parties well, don't you all?