World War III RP Militaries

Status
Not open for further replies.

Wing

Banned
Joined
Aug 21, 2007
Messages
14,789
Reaction score
0
This thread is for posting your country's militaries and information for it such as soldiers, weapons, vehicles, and other information using the template below. WARNING: If information given contradicts Bac's history, it will have to be changed.
5ofapx.jpg


Name: French Royal Army
Commander in Chief: Monsieur President Pierre LaRoche
Personnel (Regular Army) 134,000
Personnel (Reserve Forces) 15,500
Main Battle Tanks:
407 Leclercs
614 AMX-30B2s
Reconnaissance vehicles:
1280 VBLs
192 ERC-90s
337 AMX-10RCs
Infantry Fighting vehicles:
601 AMX-10Ps
VBCI (550 combat version and 150 command version)
Armoured Personnel Carriers:
3,975 VABs
Artillery pieces and mortar:
105 TRF1s
72 Caesar systems
134 AMX 30 AuF1s
Helicopters:
80 Eurocopter Tigers
10 EC-175s
4 AS-352s
18 AS-555s
21 AS-532
276 Gazelles
101 SA-330s
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chubby_(mine_detection_system)
 

Green Ranger

DRAGONZORD!
Administrator
SWRP Supporter
Joined
Dec 6, 2005
Messages
21,029
Reaction score
2,804
lol frenchies wear paintbuckets.
 

Kansiov

New Member
SWRP Writer
Joined
Oct 19, 2007
Messages
24
Reaction score
0
Ok, no paint buckets for my guys :p

Ground Force
250px-ChineseArmyspecial1lg.jpg


Active Troops: 1,750,000
Total Troops : 6,524,000
Paramilitary force: 2,890,000

Main Battle Tanks
1300~Type 99
3400~Type 96
300~Type 88 (To be phased out)

Light Tanks
400~Type 63
300~Type 62

Infantry Fighting Vehicles
1200~Type 89
300~WZ 523

OCC: More to come.
 

Will

Quizmaster General
SWRP Writer
Joined
Sep 15, 2006
Messages
8,586
Reaction score
1
Where's Bac's History?
 

Brandon Rhea

Shadow in the Starlight
Administrator
Joined
Nov 27, 2005
Messages
67,946
Reaction score
3,859
Stop asking or I'm not going to do it. I have homework and a lot of other things to do that take priority over writing this history.
 

Ser Gregor

M*A*S*Hed Potatoes
SWRP Writer
Joined
Dec 23, 2006
Messages
18,425
Reaction score
32
Stop asking or I'm not going to do it. I have homework and a lot of other things to do that take priority over writing this history.
Relax, he's asking because Bender made it look like it was done.
 

Brandon Rhea

Shadow in the Starlight
Administrator
Joined
Nov 27, 2005
Messages
67,946
Reaction score
3,859
I'm getting a little testy because I'm sick of the PMs and MSNs about it.
 

Will

Quizmaster General
SWRP Writer
Joined
Sep 15, 2006
Messages
8,586
Reaction score
1
Sorry Bac. I thought It was done by the way Bender worded it.

Ok then:
Ground Forces:

jinrohthewolfbrigade299et8.jpg

Personnel: 250,000 infantry units, armed with automatic anti-personel rifles.

Before i put up tanks and other vehicles, i want to know how futuristic we can be...​
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Brandon Rhea

Shadow in the Starlight
Administrator
Joined
Nov 27, 2005
Messages
67,946
Reaction score
3,859
Sorry Bac. I thought It was done by the way Bender worded it.

Ok then:
Ground Forces:

jinrohthewolfbrigade299et8.jpg

Personnel: 250,000 infantry units, armed with automatic anti-personel rifles.

Before i put up tanks and other vehicles, i want to know how futuristic we can be...​

You should get any ideas of "futuristic" out of your mind. Keep it relatively the same, other than the force field things that they now have around tanks and the laser weapons they're trying to install on tanks too.
 

Will

Quizmaster General
SWRP Writer
Joined
Sep 15, 2006
Messages
8,586
Reaction score
1
You should get any ideas of "futuristic" out of your mind. Keep it relatively the same, other than the force field things that they now have around tanks and the laser weapons they're trying to install on tanks too.

So no mechanised exo skeletons? They are in development... And are you being sarcastic about forcefields and lasers? Because it would take a nuclear powerplant to build up energy fo a laser to be shot like the films.

EDIT: yep, i can see the sarcasm now.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Sovereign

Veteran Member
SWRP Writer
Joined
Dec 7, 2005
Messages
24,621
Reaction score
20
You're Not Going To Have Robotic Samurais Ok??
 

Will

Quizmaster General
SWRP Writer
Joined
Sep 15, 2006
Messages
8,586
Reaction score
1
You're Not Going To Have Robotic Samurais Ok??

I guess... But i do love mechas and exo suits (which are in development right now)... Ah well! on to modern looking tanks!
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Wing

Banned
Joined
Aug 21, 2007
Messages
14,789
Reaction score
0
I am sure there will be some advances, but nothing like robot or clone armies, giant lasers, or teleporters. Keep it as little futuristic as possible.
 

Epic

Active Member
SWRP Writer
Joined
Nov 26, 2005
Messages
4,346
Reaction score
0
They have Laser weapons.... Sort of. There's a weapon that's just a Giant Heater. It makes the person they use it on feel like their burning alive. I saw it on Futureweapons.
 

Wing

Banned
Joined
Aug 21, 2007
Messages
14,789
Reaction score
0
Most weapons that are developed aren't used because they are inhumane. Like the flame thrower was discontinued from use by the US military, but not all countries would care if there weapons are inhumane.
 

Epic

Active Member
SWRP Writer
Joined
Nov 26, 2005
Messages
4,346
Reaction score
0
The Flamethrower was phased out(Not discontinued) because it isn't a very effective weapon. It's a more psychological weapon than anything. It was too dangerous for our boys to use, since everyone knew that once that guy wearing the thing got shot, he'd probably get shot in the tank on the back, killing, not just him, but everyone around him most likely.


And the Giant Heater thing that I mentioned is Non-Lethal, so it's VERY Humane. It was designed for Riot Control.
 

Ser Gregor

M*A*S*Hed Potatoes
SWRP Writer
Joined
Dec 23, 2006
Messages
18,425
Reaction score
32
Most weapons that are developed aren't used because they are inhumane. Like the flame thrower was discontinued from use by the US military, but not all countries would care if there weapons are inhumane.
Yes, cause the weapons we use are so humane.
 

Wing

Banned
Joined
Aug 21, 2007
Messages
14,789
Reaction score
0
I mean like flame throwers burn people to death, and they suffer before they die. Guns most of time kill the person, and in some cases yes they do live for a while and suffer.

And I wouldn't say "we". You are Canadian. I am French American. Our countries have diffrent methods.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top