SWRP Suggestions Drive

[Horizon]

Remember that avatar sizes would most likely depend on whatever skin we have with the smallest avatar space. The avatar size is what it is now because of the Pitch Black skin. Bigger avatars would start to make the user info space look like crap in that skin.

It's a trade off.

Just to clarify, the info space is directly under our names correct?

(A dumb question I know, but I'd like to be certain on that)

 

[Brandon Rhea]

Just to clarify, the info space is directly under our names correct?

(A dumb question I know, but I'd like to be certain on that)

Yeah, it's that whole left hand panel.

 

[Horizon]

Yeah, it's that whole left hand panel.

Oh well poo. I've never found that panel to be very appealing aside from the titles I usually spot.

 

[Lucid]

You pay for the site and then we'll talk about your veto power.

LOL owned.

ALSO: NY Times icon removed. Thanks for the reminder...i'd meant to do that ages ago.

 

[Guardian Six]

how about a shoutbox?

 

[Brandon Rhea]

how about a shoutbox?

Please read this thread to find out what the answer to that is.

 

[Guardian Six]

how about telling us when our characters get paid. this way we can get more credits

 

[Wing]

SWRP tank tops plz

 

[Wing]

A privately girly man who occasionally roleplays on SWRP?

Indeed. Will not be private for long. :)

 

[Brandon Rhea]

how about telling us when our characters get paid. this way we can get more credits

Credits don't mean much in the RP, but if you want to get more credits then you have to RP for them, and another character has to give your character the credits.

 

[Guardian Six]

how about swrp thongs? :p

 

[Horizon]

IMO, it makes things so much easier without a credit system.

 

[Guardian Six]

so we should rid of it!

 

[Brandon Rhea]

so we should rid of it!

There's nothing to get rid of, since we don't have a credits system. That part of the character profile is there for those who want to use it, because it's an indicator of what you can and can't get or use in the RP.

For example, if you only have 1,000 credits, you can't suddenly have a warship out of nowhere.

 

[Venom]

There's nothing to get rid of, since we don't have a credits system. That part of the character profile is there for those who want to use it, because it's an indicator of what you can and can't get or use in the RP.

For example, if you only have 1,000 credits, you can't suddenly have a warship out of nowhere.

Lol. You havent been looking at what characters do often enough.

 

[Phil]

Credits depend on the character. Those who work for factions like the Republic or Empire would prolly make good money, same could be for freelancers depending on how good they do. But really, long as you don't do something stupid like flaunt hundreds of thousands, or millions if you go that far, credits around like it was chump change you should be good unless you have a very very good explination, which I can't think of many.


One suggestion though, that may make things a little more tidier, is to go and delete users who joined years ago who have 0 posts. As in, old Users who basically just joined and never did a darn thing.

 

[Brandon Rhea]

One suggestion though, that may make things a little more tidier, is to go and delete users who joined years ago who have 0 posts. As in, old Users who basically just joined and never did a darn thing.

That won't happen. My philosophy is that if someone creates an account, we should meet the expectation that the account will be there should they choose to ever use it.

 

[Guardian Six]

yeah because I joined in 2009 in jan. and just came back on 07-15-2011

 

[Phil]

yeah because I joined in 2009 in jan. and just came back on 07-15-2011

Again, those who had 0 posts. You had some posts in 2009.

I mean mostly individuals who fit all three of the following.

• Joined before say 2011.
• Did little to nothing to their account.
• Never once posted a single thing on the site.

It would certanly clear a lot of members out, and if for some reason they came back, then there is no hard work in once more joining. But since it's not gonna happen then it's sorta moot to discuss it.

 

[Brandon Rhea]

Again, those who had 0 posts. You had some posts in 2009.

I mean mostly individuals who fit all three of the following.

• Joined before say 2011.
• Did little to nothing to their account.
• Never once posted a single thing on the site.

It would certanly clear a lot of members out, and if for some reason they came back, then there is no hard work in once more joining. But since it's not gonna happen then it's sorta moot to discuss it.

Beyond what I mentioned earlier, leaving them there doesn't negatively affect anything either.