- Joined
- Nov 27, 2005
- Messages
- 67,946
- Reaction score
- 3,859
- Staff
- #181
MAJOR QUESTION: What's going on with the Republic? Is the Resistance not part of the Republic? I'm kind of left really confused on the relationship between these two factions, if they're even different factions. I hope someone knows the answer to this, because it bugs me.
The inclusion of the Republic is by far the most glaring flaw in the film. It's mentioned only a few times, the relationship between it and the Resistance is never properly explained, and the destruction of the Hosnian system is given no context and no reason to invest in.
Luckily, The Force Awakens Visual Dictionary (which is fantastic) goes into a lot more detail. So I'll give the cliffnotes. The Republic became focused on peace after it signed the Galactic Concordance with the Empire, which marked the end of the Galactic Civil War. The treaty was signed around the time of the Battle of Jakku. The Empire was given predetermined borders that it could stay within, and its remnants disappeared into the Unknown Regions. The Republic wanted to bring harmony to the galaxy and convince disaffected systems that it was different from the Empire and from the Old Republic. One of the things it did was choose to rotate its capital by having people (maybe the Senate) vote on what the capital should be every so often. Hosnian Prime was the most recently elected capital world, so that's where the Senate and the chancellor were based.
The Republic also disarmed most of its fleet. Leia never agreed with that decision. She thought it was foolish of the Republic to assume that the Empire would never be a threat again. When the First Order revealed itself, Leia continued to warn about the Imperial threat. Not only did the Republic not listen to her, since they were content to let the First Order abide by the dictates of the Galactic Concordance, it labeled here a warmonger and slandered her reputation. They said she was still stuck in the Galactic Civil War, while the galaxy had moved on to more peaceful and prosperous times. Because the Republic refused to act, Leia formed the Resistance.
The Resistance was very weak, but it provided a basic check against the designs of the First Order. It had the begrudging approval of the Senate to operate. Leia had an envoy, Korr Sella, who would go between her and the Senate as a liaison. When it was clear that the First Order was becoming a clear and present danger by the start of the film, she sent Korr Sella to Hosnian Prime to convince the Republic to take direct military action. You can see her, and the chancellor, on Hosnian Prime in the scene that depicts its destruction. So once the First Order's threat was evident, it was too late for the Senate to act.
All of that is great info that I'm glad the book elaborated on. It should have been in the movie, though.
Why do we have to acknowledge that the way you're asking? It's stated outright in the film.Since I never got a response when I posted this way back at the beginning of the thread, I'll ask again.
This coming from someone who has only watched the movies, can we acknowledge the fact that the blue saber the characters find is the one that Luke lost in Cloud City? He made a new one for The Return, which was green. They made it seem like Luke left his life and his saber behind. Maybe I'm wrong because they didn't say that specifically, it's just the vibe I got. If 2017 comes around and they say "hey where did you find that?" And don't make any recognition of the fact he already has his green one, I'll be upset.
I don't think they ever implied that they left that saber behind, though. That's not at all the vibe I got. The vibe was just that this was the true Skywalker lightsaber, because it belonged to Anakin and then to Luke - and now to Rey, who is presumably a Skywalker.